top of page

Missouri voters approved a ballot measure to legalize marijuana on Tuesday.

Legal Missouri 2022 is behind the measure, and the campaign has worked for months to convince voters to pass Amendment 3 despite criticism from certain cannabis reform activists and prohibitionists alike.

window.addEventListener("message", receiveMessage, false); function receiveMessage(event) { if (event.origin !== "https://embeds.ddhq.io") { return } else if (event.data.id && event.data.height) { document.getElementById(event.data.id).style.height = event.data.height + 'px' } }

Results tracker sponsored by

Here’s what the Legal Missouri 2022 initiative will accomplish: 

Adults 21 and older will be able to purchase and possess up to three ounces of cannabis.

They can also grow up to six flowering marijuana plants, six immature plants and six clones if they obtain a registration card.

The initiative will impose a six percent tax on recreational cannabis sales and use revenue to facilitate automatic expungements for people with certain non-violent marijuana offenses on their records.

Remaining revenue will go toward veterans’ healthcare, substance misuse treatment and the state’s public defender system.

The Department of Health and Senior Services will be responsible for regulating the program and issuing licenses for cannabis businesses.

Regulators will be required to issue at least 144 microbusiness licenses through a lottery system, with priority given to low-income applicants and people who have been disproportionately impacted by drug criminalization.

Existing medical marijuana dispensaries will also be first in line to start serving adult consumers with dual licenses.

Regulators can create rules around advertising, but they cannot be any more stringent than existing restrictions on alcohol marketing.

Public consumption, driving under the influence of cannabis and underage marijuana use will be explicitly prohibited.

A seed-to-sale tracking system will be established for the marijuana market.

Local jurisdictions will be able to opt out of permitting cannabis microbusinesses or retailers from operating in their area if voters approve the ban at the ballot.

The measure will further codify employment protections for medical cannabis patients.

Medical marijuana cards will be valid for three years at a time, instead of one. And caregivers will be able to serve double the number of patients.

“This is truly a historic occasion,” Dan Viets, Missouri NORML coordinator and chair of the Amendment 3 advisory board, said. “This means that the great majority of the 20,000 people who have been arrested year after year in Missouri will no longer be subject to criminal prosecution for victimless marijuana law violations.”

#Legalmo22#YesOn3 Campaign Win Statement 🙌 Congrats, #Missouri! We did it! pic.twitter.com/AUxAIyY0O5

— Legal Missouri 2022 (@LegalMo22) November 9, 2022


Polls released in September and early November by Emerson College and The Hill found that a plurality of very likely Missouri voters supported the marijuana legalization initiative, but also showed significant shares of voters were still undecided on the measure.

In September, SurveyUSA found 62 percent of Missouri likely voters were “certain to vote yes” on Amendment 3. The firm is also behind the latest survey on the initiative, finding that the race was only slightly tightening as Election Day approached, with 61 percent of likely Missouri voters saying they were “certain” to approve it.

Those results were more encouraging for the campaign than a survey from Remington Research Group and Missouri Scout that found just 43 percent of likely voters favored the initiative.

However, as Legal Missouri 2022 was quick to point out, the same firm behind that survey previously missed the mark when it found just slim support for a 2018 medical cannabis ballot measure that ultimately passed overwhelmingly.

Missouri made history tonight! We will be the 20th state to legalize, tax, regulate adult-use marijuana! Congrats to everyone who worked so hard to get us here! #YesOn3@LegalMo22pic.twitter.com/HrFZxdUXiO

— MoCannTrade (@mocanntrade) November 9, 2022


Throughout this election year, the campaign battled legal challenges and opposition not just from prohibitionists but also a coalition of reform advocates who have taken issue with the particulars of the proposal.

Most recently, the campaign has found itself pushing back against criticism from a U.S. congresswoman and the Missouri NAACP, which sent a cease-and-desist letter over alleged unauthorized use of its branding.

A spokesperson for Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO) offered a veiled criticism of the ballot initiative, telling Marijuana Moment that the congresswoman “believes that at its core every state and local drug policy reform and initiative must be rooted in…equity and restorative justice like those she has called for and helped pass at the federal level.”

St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones (D) came out against the proposal. She expressed concern about enacting the reform as a constitutional amendment and said that any attempt to do so would need to be for a measure that is “forward-thinking, flexible and most of all, equitable.” She said Amendment 3 “fails to meet that lofty aim.”

Rep. Ashley Bland-Manlove (D), chair of the Missouri Legislative Black Caucus, was among the measure’s most notable opponents. She announced in August that she was forming a coalition to inform voters about what she views as deficiencies in the proposal, particularly as they concern industry equity.

Even the Missouri Democratic Party took a neutral position on the measure in light of those certain concerns, even though the party supports legalization generally. That is also the case with the state Libertarian Party.

A group of activists formed a campaign—comprised of lawmakers, a former Missouri lieutenant governor, legalization supporters and the director of the state chapter of Americans for Prosperity—to convince voters to oppose the initiative and compel the governor to add cannabis reform to the legislative agenda of a special session.

To that end, Rep. Ron Hicks (R) introduced a revised marijuana legalization bill in September, with the hopes that the filing would spur the governor to expand a special session to allow consideration of the emergency reform legislation as an alternative to a cannabis ballot measure.

The bill was filed just one day after the Missouri Supreme Court gave a final ruling on a legal challenge to the activist-led initiative that secured its placement on the ballot.

Hicks’s legislation has been slightly revised since it was introduced and advanced through committee during the regular session earlier this year. One key change is the addition of an emergency clause that references the ballot initiative, making it so the legislation would take effect immediately upon passage.

Gov. Mike Parson (R) said, however, that he would not add marijuana legalization to the agenda for the special session focused on tax relief and agriculture issues. However, Hicks said in a press release that “it is my hope that legislative action on my Marijuana Freedom Act will incentivize the governor to support passage of this legislation.”

Among the legalization ballot measure’s opponents were Missouri NAACP, Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, Missouri Catholic Conference, Missouri Sheriff’s United, the Missouri Hospital Association, the Missouri Farm Bureau, Missouri Baptist Convention and Pro-Choice Missouri.

Some of the state’s Democratic politicians did support the legalization ballot measure, however.

Democratic Senate candidate Trudy Busch Valentine, for example, tweeted in September that she is backing the initiative, citing its expected tax revenue and other benefits.

The largest labor organization in the state, Missouri AFL-CIO, also endorsed the legalization proposal. Missouri ACLU, the Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Missouri chapter of NORML backed the measure, too.

A lawsuit filed in August sought to keep the reform proposal off the ballot after it was certified by the secretary of state. But after two lower courts dismissed the challenge, the state Supreme Court delivered the final word that the legal battle was over.

Marijuana Moment is tracking more than 1,500 cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.—

The campaign raised a sizable bucket of contributions, with almost $700,000 in large donations in the first half of October alone.

A couple weeks out from the election, the campaign took down and reedited ads promoting their marijuana legalization ballot initiative following a challenge from a state law enforcement agency.

The original ads released by Legal Missouri 2022 featured b-roll of law enforcement officers, one entering a police car and another on a motorcycle. But the Missouri State Highway Patrol sent the campaign a cease-and-desist letter seeking the ad’s removal, saying advocates did not have permission to use the agency’s emblem.

Meanwhile, state health officials have already taken steps to prepare for approval of the legalization measure.

A different campaign, Fair Access Missouri, separately explored multiple citizen initiatives this year with the hopes of getting at least one on the ballot, but did not end up submitting signatures for any of the measures.

Marijuana and psychedelics initiatives are also on the ballot in Arkansas, Colorado, Maryland, North Dakota and South Dakota on Tuesday.

Live 2022 Marijuana Election Results

 
 
 

A Missouri court has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to remove a marijuana legalization initiative from the state’s November ballot—though the challengers said they plan to appeal the decision, with less than 10 weeks until the election.

Following the state certification of the reform initiative from Legal Missouri 2022, a person identified as a Missouri resident filed a lawsuit with the backing of the Colorado-based Protect Our Kids PAC.

The challenge from Joy Sweeney, a member of the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA) argued that the measure violated single subject rules for ballot measures under the state Constitution.

It further contested the state’s process for certifying voter signatures, suggesting that there was improper intervention by Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft (R). Prior to the verification, there was early reporting indicating that activists were coming up short in two districts in initial county tallies, but the state’s review ultimately found that the campaign had exceeded the signature requirements.

A judge with the Missouri Circuit Court of Cole County threw out the lawsuit on Friday, the day after oral arguments were presented at a hearing. The case was dismissed on procedural grounds, with the court finding that the plaintiff lacked standing because she did not prove state residency.

Sweeney said that she was a resident of Jefferson City, but the secretary of state’s office said it did not have sufficient evidence to confirm as much.

Judge Cotton Walker also said that he disagreed with the plaintiff on the merits of her two allegations, however. The judgment provides the courts findings for “informational and supplemental purposes only and reflect what this Court would have ruled on the full case of action, had it not issued its Judgment based on the failure of Plaintiff to prove an essential element of her cause of action.”

Ultimately, Walker said the court would have ruled in favor of the legalization campaign on both counts, finding that the scope and language of the measure was consistent with the single subject rule and that the secretary of state’s office dutifully carried out its responsibilities in verifying signatures to certify the initiative.

“This Court would have therefore dismissed the Petition and assessed costs against Plaintiff if it had ruled on the merits in this case,” the judgment says.

Luke Niforatos, CEO of Protect Our Kids, told Marijuana Moment on Friday that anti-legalization forces intend to appeal the ruling, though the timeline is unclear as to whether an appellate hearing would take place before the ballots are printed. The deadline to finalize measures for the ballot is on September 13.

“We are appealing this ruling because it appears the judge and secretary of state are ignoring their own records which show Joy Sweeney as a resident and voter,” Niforatos said. “This process, rife with the appearance of corruption from the start, continues to arouse suspicion as to the secretary of state office’s role in validating this petition. We expect a full hearing on appeal and a more proper judgment.”

Legalization advocates, for their part, are praising the new court ruling.

“Today we took another step towards the historic passage of this citizen-led initiative to regulate, tax and legalize marijuana in Missouri, while automatically expunging past, nonviolent marijuana offenses from Missourians’ records,” John Payne, Legal Missouri 2022 campaign manager, said. “We are thrilled that Missourians will have the opportunity to pass Amendment 3 in November, which will allow law enforcement to better focus on violent crime, while bringing millions in new revenue to Missouri.”

We are thrilled that #Missourians will have the opportunity to pass Amendment 3 in November, which will allow law enforcement to better focus on violent crime, while bringing millions in new revenue to #Missouri.” – John Payne, Campaign Manager #legalmo22https://t.co/oDBy700aJmpic.twitter.com/GhklONYgN4

— Legal Missouri 2022 (@LegalMo22) September 9, 2022


Ashcroft said in a press release that “regardless of whether you’re for or against the issue, my office responded efficiently and appropriately to the thousands of signatures turned in.”

“Foremost, we did the right thing in certifying this measure to the ballot within the bounds of the constitution and the laws passed by the general assembly,” he said. “We followed the law—we did everything right.”

Secretary Ashcroft was pleased with the court’s decision to uphold his ballot certification and the process pertaining to the Marijuana Ballot Initiative. #moleghttps://t.co/ezl1VUTCzmpic.twitter.com/zHeoBTkomv

— Missouri SOS Office (@MissouriSOS) September 9, 2022


Separately, the governor of Missouri recently ruled out the idea of expanding a special legislative session he convened to add marijuana legalization to the agenda, despite a push by some pro-reform activists and lawmakers who have criticized the ballot initiative.

Here’s what the Legal Missouri 2022 initiative would accomplish: 

Adults 21 and older could purchase and possess up to three ounces of cannabis.

They could also grow up to six flowering marijuana plants, six immature plants and six clones if they obtain a registration card.

The initiative would impose a six percent tax on recreational cannabis sales and use revenue to facilitate automatic expungements for people with certain non-violent marijuana offenses on their records.

Remaining revenue would go toward veterans’ healthcare, substance misuse treatment and the state’s public defender system.

The Department of Health and Senior Services would be responsible for regulating the program and issuing licenses for cannabis businesses.

Regulators would be required to issue at least 144 microbusiness licenses through a lottery system, with priority given to low-income applicants and people who have been disproportionately impacted by drug criminalization.

Existing medical marijuana dispensaries would also be first in line to start serving adult consumers with dual licenses.

Regulators could create rules around advertising, but they could not be any more stringent than existing restrictions on alcohol marketing.

Public consumption, driving under the influence of cannabis and underage marijuana use would be explicitly prohibited.

A seed-to-sale tracking system would be established for the marijuana market.

Local jurisdictions would be able to opt out of permitting cannabis microbusinesses or retailers from operating in their area if voters approve the ban at the ballot.

The measure would further codify employment protections for medical cannabis patients.

Medical marijuana cards would be valid for three years at a time, instead of one. And caregivers would be able to serve double the number of patients.

Payne previously led a successful ballot effort to legalize medical cannabis in the Show-Me State in 2018.

Marijuana Moment is tracking more than 1,500 cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.—

A strong majority of Missouri voters, including a plurality of Republicans, support legalizing marijuana for adult use, a recent poll found. And state health officials are already taking steps to prepare for voter approval of the legalization measure.

A different campaign, Fair Access Missouri, separately explored multiple citizen initiatives this year with the hopes of getting at least one on the ballot, but did not end up submitting signatures for any of the measures.

Read the judgment on the Missouri marijuana legalization ballot case below: 

Senator Says Marijuana Banking Bill Will Help Lightbulb Manufacturers And Others Outside Of Cannabis Industry

Photo elements courtesy of rawpixel and Philip Steffan.

 
 
 

With about one month left until voters head to the polls, things are heating up in the fight to legalize medical marijuana in Missouri.

Three competing medical cannabis ballot initiatives—including two proposed constitutional amendments and one statutory measure—officially qualified for the ballot in August. And in the weeks since, sponsoring committees for the proposals have engaged in a public rivalry that’s landed Missouri in the national spotlight.

Backing Amendment 2, the group New Approach Missouri has received some of the most high-profile endorsements. Missouri NORML, St. Louis’s NAACP chapter, Freedom Incorporated and the St. Louis American newspaper have all recently thrown their support behind the amendment, for example.

#StLouis@NAACP President Adolphus Pruitt endorses #YesOn2#MedicalMarijuana in #Missouri

Join the #MMJ movement! Text YesOn2 to 52886 pic.twitter.com/JLdqBteK88

— New Approach MO (@NewApproachMO) September 21, 2018


Taxation seems to be a top concern across the board.

Amendment 3, sponsored by attorney Dr. Brad Bradshaw and Find the Cures, would impose the highest sales tax rate on medical cannabis in the country: 15 percent, compared to 7.25 percent in California. New Approach Missouri has seized on that point, arguing that the measure would be prohibitively expensive for patients by setting the highest medical cannabis tax rate in the nation.

“Amendment 3 is exploiting patients with serious and life-changing diagnosis, like cancer, epilepsy and multiple sclerosis, who are seeking this treatment to ease the pain and suffering from their symptoms,” New Approach Missouri spokesperson Jack Cardetti said in a press release Wednesday.

Amendment 2 would tax retail marijuana sales at four percent, and the third initiative, Missourians for Patient Care-backed Proposition C, would impose a two percent sales tax rate.

(See below for a chart showing how other states that currently allow medical cannabis tax it.)

Find the Cures hasn’t backed down despite pressure from the competing campaigns. In fact, Bradshaw filed lawsuits against Missourians for Patient Care and New Approach Missouri in August, alleging that the former submitted invalid signatures and the latter illegally collected signatures.

New Approach Missouri “ran an intentional, systematic, pervasive, and ubiquitous pattern of instructing individuals to violate the legal requirements of the petition signature gathering process,” Bradshaw claimed in the lawsuit.

But the lawsuits didn’t get far. Bradshaw ultimately dropped his suit against Missourians for Patient Care. And a circuit court denied the other suit against New Approach Missouri—a ruling upheld by an appeals court, which denied the attorney a rehearing, in September.

Missouri voters could have had the opportunity to hear out each campaign’s arguments at a moderated forum last month, but representatives for two of the sponsoring campaigns—Missourians for Patient Care and Find the Cures—dropped out of the debate at the last minute.

Based on polling, it appears likely that Missouri voters will approve at least one of the medical cannabis initiatives. The question is whether these heated campaign fights will lead to vote splitting that could jeopardize the reform efforts. As a general rule, the top vote-getter prevails in Missouri; but in this case, if voters green light both a constitutional amendment and the statutory amendment, the fate of the program could be left largely up to the courts.

And it’s not just competition between pro-legalization sponsors that could influence the vote in November. Outright opponents of marijuana reform are entering the ring, as well. A recently formed committee, Citizens for Safe Medicine, is campaigning against all three of the initiatives. Financial disclosure statements aren’t yet available, though, so it’s not clear what kind of resources the committee will bring to the table.

Citizens for Safe Medicine, which bills itself as a coalition of medical professionals, teachers and businesses, appears to be connected to a nonprofit organized called the Council for Drug Free Youth, which receives some of its funding from the federal government. The nonprofit and the campaign committee share a phone number and at least one staff member, according to public filings and their websites.

For legalization supporters and opponents alike, time to sway the vote in Missouri is quickly running out, though. Election Day is just 32 days away. And on a related note, residents will also have the chance to elect a U.S Senator, both of whom have weighed in on their marijuana policy ahead of the vote.

New Approach Missouri circulated the following chart, using data compiled by the Marijuana Policy Project, that shows how other states with legal medical cannabis tax it:

State

Sales Tax Rate on Medical Marijuana

Alaska

n/a

Arkansas

6.50%

Arizona

5.60%

California

7.25% (state-registered patients exempt from standard sales tax)

Colorado

2.90%

Connecticut

6.35%

Delaware

0%

DC

6%

Florida

6%

Hawaii

4% (4.5% on Oahu)

Illinois

1%

Maine

5.50%

Maryland

0%

Massachusetts

0%

Michigan

3%

Minnesota

0%

Montana

0%

Nevada

0%

New Hampshire

0%

New Jersey

7%

New Mexico

5.13%

New York

7%

North Dakota

5%

Ohio

5.75%

Oklahoma

7%

Oregon

0%

Pennsylvania

0%

Rhode Island

7%

Vermont

0%

Washington

n/a

West Virginia

0%

Photo courtesy of Chris Wallis // Side Pocket Images.

 
 
 

Global SEO Keywords

marihuana, cannabis, cáñamo, CBD, aceite de CBD, bálsamo de CBD, marijuana, hemp, weed, CBD oil, CBD balm, canapa, erba, olio di CBD, balsamo CBD, chanvre, herbe, huile de CBD, baume CBD, Marihuana, Cannabis, Hanf, Gras, CBD Öl, CBD Balsam, maconha, cânhamo, erva, óleo de CBD, bálsamo CBD, hennep, wiet, CBD olie, CBD balsem, hampa, gräs, CBD olja, CBD balsam, hamp, græs, gress, CBD olje, hamppu, ruoho, CBD öljy, CBD balsami, konopie, konopie indyjskie, olej CBD, balsam CBD, konopí, CBD olej, CBD balzám, konope, CBD balzam, marihuána, kannabisz, kender, fű, CBD olaj, CBD balzsam, canabis, cânepă, iarbă, ulei CBD, марихуана, канабис, коноп, CBD масло, CBD балсам, μαριχουάνα, κάνναβη, χασίς, λάδι CBD, βάλσαμο CBD, kanabis, konoplja, trava, CBD ulje, CBD olje, kanapės, kanapės indinės, CBD aliejus, CBD balzamas, marihuāna, kaņepes, CBD eļļa, CBD balzams, marihuaana, kanep, CBD õli, CBD palsam, kannabis, qanneb, żejt CBD, balsam CBD, marijúna, hampur, CBD olía, CBD smyrsl

Disclaimer

Jacob Hooy CBD Lip Balm is free from parabens and artificial colorants and contains no toxins or heavy metals, supporting natural body care. Our products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, medical condition, or symptom. The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and must not be considered medical advice, nor a substitute for professional diagnosis, treatment, or guidance provided by qualified physicians, healthcare professionals, or pharmaceutical specialists. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as a recommendation, prescription, or therapeutic claim.

Difresh Spain is an online retail store registered under IAE Group 652.3, specializing in the retail trade of perfumery, cosmetic products, and personal hygiene and care items. NIF: Y3526859-F. E-mail: info@cbdvending.eu - WhatsApp: +34662918154 - Factory adress: Calle Albardín 13, Nave B07, 50720, La cartuja baja, Zaragoza, España. All prices include VAT and free shipping across all European Union countries.

© 2026 - www.cbdvending.euPrivacy Policy

bottom of page